6.28.2006

Oh, the English language

When you write copy you have the right to copyright the copy you write, if the copy is right. If however, your copy falls over, you must right your copy. If you write religious services you write rite, and have the right to copyright the rite you write. Very conservative people write right copy, and have the right to copyright the right copy they write. A right wing cleric would write right rite, and has the right to copyright the right rite he has the right to write. His editor has the job of making the right rite copy right before the copyright can be right. Should Jim Wright decide to write right rite, then Wright would write right rite, which Wright has the right to copyright. Duplicating that rite would copy Wright right rite, and violate copyright, which Wright would have the right to right. Right?

7 Comments:

At 1:06 PM, Blogger Rileysowner said...

You WAAAAYYY TO MUCH time on your hand.

 
At 1:11 PM, Blogger val said...

hey, thanks for adding us to your links! (i think... though i'm not sure directing a bunch of pastors our way is a good idea...should i be nervous?) :)

you and matt should discuss 1776 when you finish.

 
At 1:53 PM, Blogger Steve said...

Hey Riley, touchy subject.
Only one hour a week, right? Two in my case.
I found it while reading online, copied and pasted. Roughly 30 seconds, tops.

 
At 2:00 PM, Blogger Sara said...

Isn't it right to site the copyright of what you write if it's by Jim Wright?

 
At 10:17 AM, Blogger Steve said...

This write wasn't copywrote as I found it. So I think I'm in the right and didn't unright a copyright. Nor was the writer of the write named.

 
At 4:06 PM, Blogger val said...

alRIGHT already!!

 
At 6:10 PM, Blogger Irenicum said...

Wow! You scare me!

 

Post a Comment

<< Home